להתחברות

הקבוצה הסגולה סיכום | עמוד דיון

In order to view the discussion - please log in.

תגובות אחרונות

user profile image
Iskender Dink
2.12.2019 13:27

Basically, the idea can be implemented in the private sector! At company level, the limits are too low. With this regulation the medium-size enterprises are strongly loaded. These make up a large part in Germany. Thus large criticism would arise here. The decision what would happen with the money would be possible, but is very difficult to implement in Germany! This would cause a complete change of the system. In addition, exact conditions must be developed, which societies may be supported.

user profile image
דניאל בן צבי
25.11.2019 17:49

it is possible the public will say that it is not moral to  charge the inheritance tax from and espicallay in such a fragile situtaion as death of a love one. in addition the asstets had already been taxed so why the government need to tax twice on the same assets.

user profile image
דניאל בן צבי
25.11.2019 17:42

the tax will reduce inequality, and will allow the public to choose where they want to influence with the new recruited funds in the society. further more the new funds will improve the government services the public receive.

user profile image
דניאל בן צבי
25.11.2019 17:38
in our opinion the right policy will be to impose a progressive tax that will begin from the amount of total assets of 1.5 million shekel. For example, the first strip of assets will be between 1.5-3 millions shekels. In addition, there will be exceptions that will be approached in the most just way. When the assets are capital assets there will be an option to postpone the payment of the tax till the owner will decide to sell the asset. Although it is a mandatory tax, there will be an option to choose from a variety of organizations/institutes to transfer them the money.

מקורות קשורים

סטודנטים